Quadro K2000 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

2013Core: 954 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Seria Radeon HD 7700

2012Boost: 925 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K2000 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K2000 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K2000

2013

Why buy it

  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Draws 51W instead of 250W, a 199W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 276.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 10.1 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Seria Radeon HD 7700

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $440 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 282% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 390.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 51W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Seria Radeon HD 7700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.4% in PassMark G3D (1,604 vs 1,582), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K2000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Seria Radeon HD 7700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $440 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 282% (10.1 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Seria Radeon HD 7700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K2000 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K2000 vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000

The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Seria Radeon HD 7700

The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Seria Radeon HD 7700 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700).

FeatureQuadro K2000Seria Radeon HD 7700
G3D Mark Score
1,582
1,604+1%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7327 TFLOPS
3.789 TFLOPS+417%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
32 KB
512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000Seria Radeon HD 7700
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 carries 512 MB. Quadro K2000 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K2000 and 64-bit on the Seria Radeon HD 7700. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000) vs 768 KB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K2000Seria Radeon HD 7700
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
768 KB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Seria Radeon HD 7700's 250W — a 132.2% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro K2000Seria Radeon HD 7700
TDP
51W-80%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
202mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
31.0+384%
6.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro K2000 came in at $599, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 launched at $159. On MSRP, Seria Radeon HD 7700 was 73.5% cheaper ($440 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro K2000) vs 10.1 (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 offers 288.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K2000 (2013 vs 2012).

FeatureQuadro K2000Seria Radeon HD 7700
MSRP
$599
$159-73%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
10.1+288%
Codename
GK107
Tahiti
Release
March 1 2013
January 9 2012
Ranking
#756
#431

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.