Quadro K2000 vs Radeon Vega 8
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:
Radeon Vega 8
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank 261 and the Radeon Vega 8 is on rank 363, so the Quadro K2000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Vega 8
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 8 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Vega 8 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Vega 8.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Vega 8 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $500 for the Quadro K2000, it costs 92% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 1139.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1139.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon Vega 8
Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon Vega 8
The Radeon Vega 8 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,569 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon Vega 8 reaches 1,569 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 8 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 8). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 8).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,569 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+132% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+14% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 8 has 0 MB. The Quadro K2000 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon Vega 8's 45W — a 12.5% difference. The Radeon Vega 8 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 1W (Radeon Vega 8). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W | 45W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 202mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0 | 34.9+13% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon Vega 8 launched at $150 and now averages $40. The Radeon Vega 8 costs 92% less ($460 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 39.2 (Radeon Vega 8) — the Radeon Vega 8 offers 1125% better value. The Radeon Vega 8 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon Vega 8 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $40-92% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 39.2+1125% |
| Codename | GK107 | Cezanne |
| Release | March 1 2013 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #756 | #601 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K2000 and Radeon Vega 8
