
Quadro K2000
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6790
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000 is positioned at rank #261 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 6790.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 6790 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 6790 holds the technical lead. Priced at $149 (vs $500), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 232.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+232.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($149) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000 and Radeon HD 6790

Quadro K2000
The Quadro K2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,582 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon HD 6790
The Radeon HD 6790 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 840 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,567 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000 scores 1,582 and the Radeon HD 6790 reaches 1,567 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 6790 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000) vs 800 (Radeon HD 6790). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000) vs 1.344 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,582 | 1,567 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 800+108% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS | 1.344 TFLOPS+83% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 160 KB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6790 has 1 GB. The Quadro K2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 6790). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+7% | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (Quadro K2000) vs None (Radeon HD 6790). Decoder: NVDEC 1st gen vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (Quadro K2000) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Radeon HD 6790).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st gen | UVD 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000 draws 51W versus the Radeon HD 6790's 150W — a 98.5% difference. The Quadro K2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000) vs 450W (Radeon HD 6790). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80.
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W-66% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.0+198% | 10.4 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Radeon HD 6790 launched at $149 and now averages $149. The Radeon HD 6790 costs 70.2% less ($351 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 3.2 (Quadro K2000) vs 10.5 (Radeon HD 6790) — the Radeon HD 6790 offers 228.1% better value. The Quadro K2000 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K2000 | Radeon HD 6790 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $149-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $149-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 10.5+228% |
| Codename | GK107 | Barts |
| Release | March 1 2013 | April 4 2011 |
| Ranking | #756 | #759 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















