
Quadro K2000D vs GeForce GTX 555

Quadro K2000D
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 555
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000D is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 17% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+17%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000D and GeForce GTX 555

Quadro K2000D
The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 555
The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the GeForce GTX 555 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 555 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 144 (GeForce GTX 555). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,600 | 1,604 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+167% | 144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7327 TFLOPS+77% | 0.4147 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 192 KB+500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K2000D comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB. The Quadro K2000D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000D) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+100% | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 555).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 1st Gen | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the GeForce GTX 555's 70W — a 31.4% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 51W-27% | 70W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 202mm | 210mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.4+37% | 22.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 17.1% better value. The Quadro K2000D is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro K2000D | GeForce GTX 555 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $150-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35 | $30-14% |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7 | 53.5+17% |
| Codename | GK107 | GF116 |
| Release | March 1 2013 | May 14 2011 |
| Ranking | #750 | #849 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












