Quadro K2000D
VS
GeForce GTX 555

Quadro K2000D vs GeForce GTX 555

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

2013Core: 954 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 555

2011Core: 720 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K2000D is positioned at rank #257 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K2000D

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#241
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#257
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#258
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#259
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#260
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#261
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#263
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#264
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#265
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#266
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#267
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#268
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#269
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#270
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#271
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 555 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K2000D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 555 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 555 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $35), it costs 14% less, resulting in a 17% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+17%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($35)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K2000D and GeForce GTX 555

NVIDIA

Quadro K2000D

The Quadro K2000D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 954 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 51W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 555

The GeForce GTX 555 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 14 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K2000D scores 1,600 and the GeForce GTX 555 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K2000D is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 555 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K2000D) vs 144 (GeForce GTX 555). Raw compute: 0.7327 TFLOPS (Quadro K2000D) vs 0.4147 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 555).

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
G3D Mark Score
1,600
1,604
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+167%
144
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7327 TFLOPS+77%
0.4147 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
32 KB
192 KB+500%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K2000D comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 555 has 1 GB. The Quadro K2000D offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro K2000D) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K2000D) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 555). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro K2000D) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 555). Decoder: NVDEC 1st Gen vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro K2000D) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 555).

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
Encoder
NVENC 1st Gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Decoder
NVDEC 1st Gen
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K2000D draws 51W versus the GeForce GTX 555's 70W — a 31.4% difference. The Quadro K2000D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K2000D) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 555). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 202mm vs 210mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
TDP
51W-27%
70W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
202mm
210mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
80
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
31.4+37%
22.9
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K2000D launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce GTX 555 launched at $150 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 555 costs 14.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 45.7 (Quadro K2000D) vs 53.5 (GeForce GTX 555) — the GeForce GTX 555 offers 17.1% better value. The Quadro K2000D is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro K2000DGeForce GTX 555
MSRP
$599
$150-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$35
$30-14%
Performance per Dollar
45.7
53.5+17%
Codename
GK107
GF116
Release
March 1 2013
May 14 2011
Ranking
#750
#849