Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 M275X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 M275X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 M275X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3000M

2012

Why buy it

✅32.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M275X

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 32.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 M275X instead at 1,631 vs 1,618, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M275X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M275X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K3000M vs Radeon R9 M275X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

Radeon R9 M275X

The Radeon R9 M275X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,631 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3000M scores 1,618 and the Radeon R9 M275X reaches 1,631 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3000M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M275X uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K3000M) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275X). Raw compute: 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X).

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R9 M275X
G3D Mark Score	1,618	1,631
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576	640+11%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7534 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+57%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+20%	40
L1 Cache	48 KB	160 KB+233%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R9 M275X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275X carries 512 MB. Quadro K3000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275X. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K3000M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M275X) — the Quadro K3000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R9 M275X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3000M draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 M275X's 75W — a 0% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3000M) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R9 M275X
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	21.6	21.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R9 M275X (2014 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Radeon R9 M275X
MSRP	—	$300
Codename	GK104	Venus
Release	June 1 2012	January 28 2014
Ranking	#748	#746

Search Quadro K3000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M275X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.