Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3000M

2012

Why buy it

✅13.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.

Quadro P400

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K3000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 13.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P400 instead at 1,659 vs 1,618, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro P400 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K3000M vs Quadro P400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

Quadro P400

The Quadro P400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 7 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1252 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,659 points. Launch price was $119.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3000M scores 1,618 and the Quadro P400 reaches 1,659 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3000M is built on Kepler while the Quadro P400 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K3000M) vs 256 (Quadro P400). Raw compute: 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M) vs 0.641 TFLOPS (Quadro P400).

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Quadro P400
G3D Mark Score	1,618	1,659+3%
Architecture	Kepler	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	576+125%	256
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7534 TFLOPS+18%	0.641 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	48+200%	16
L1 Cache	48 KB	96 KB+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Quadro P400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M and 64-bit on the Quadro P400.

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Quadro P400
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3000M draws 75W versus the Quadro P400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro P400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3000M) vs 350W (Quadro P400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Quadro P400
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	145mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	21.6	55.3+156%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro P400 (2017 vs 2012).

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Quadro P400
MSRP	—	$169
Codename	GK104	GP107
Release	June 1 2012	February 7 2017
Ranking	#748	#741

Search Quadro K3000M on Amazon

Search Quadro P400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.