Quadro K3000M vs Seria Radeon HD 7700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K3000M vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K3000M vs Seria Radeon HD 7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K3000M

2012

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Seria Radeon HD 7700

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K3000M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (1,618 vs 1,604), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K3000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Seria Radeon HD 7700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Seria Radeon HD 7700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K3000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K3000M vs Seria Radeon HD 7700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K3000M

The Quadro K3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 1 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 654 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $155.

Seria Radeon HD 7700

The Seria Radeon HD 7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,604 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K3000M scores 1,618 and the Seria Radeon HD 7700 reaches 1,604 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K3000M is built on Kepler while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 576 (Quadro K3000M) vs 2,048 (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Raw compute: 0.7534 TFLOPS (Quadro K3000M) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Seria Radeon HD 7700).

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Seria Radeon HD 7700
G3D Mark Score	1,618	1,604
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	576	2048+256%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7534 TFLOPS	3.789 TFLOPS+403%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	48 KB	512 KB+967%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Seria Radeon HD 7700
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K3000M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Seria Radeon HD 7700 carries 512 MB. Quadro K3000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K3000M and 64-bit on the Seria Radeon HD 7700. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K3000M) vs 768 KB (Seria Radeon HD 7700) — the Seria Radeon HD 7700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K3000M	Seria Radeon HD 7700
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K3000M draws 75W versus the Seria Radeon HD 7700's 250W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro K3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K3000M) vs 450W (Seria Radeon HD 7700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.