
Quadro K420 vs GeForce GT 730A

Quadro K420
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 730A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K420 is positioned at rank 220 and the GeForce GT 730A is on rank 370, so the Quadro K420 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 730A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 730A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K420 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 730A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 730A holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K420 and GeForce GT 730A

Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

GeForce GT 730A
The GeForce GT 730A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 17 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 628 MHz to 657 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 743 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K420 scores 726 and the GeForce GT 730A reaches 743 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K420 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 730A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K420) vs 768 (GeForce GT 730A). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420) vs 1.009 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 730A). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 657 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 726 | 743+2% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+75% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS+109% | 1.009 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz+19% | 657 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB+75% | 64 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K420 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 730A has 512 MB. The Quadro K420 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K420) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 730A) — the Quadro K420 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K420 draws 108W versus the GeForce GT 730A's 55W — a 65% difference. The GeForce GT 730A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K420) vs 350W (GeForce GT 730A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W | 55W-49% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 13.5+101% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K420 launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 730A launched at $75 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.3 (Quadro K420) vs 37.1 (GeForce GT 730A) — the GeForce GT 730A offers 2.2% better value.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | GeForce GT 730A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | $75-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.3 | 37.1+2% |
| Codename | GK104 | GK106 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 17 2014 |
| Ranking | #475 | #813 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











