Quadro K500M
VS
Quadro FX 1800M

Quadro K500M vs Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

2013Core: 771 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K500M is positioned at rank 221 and the Quadro FX 1800M is on rank 62, so the Quadro FX 1800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K500M

#94
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
MSRP: $6999|Avg: $4799
92%
#96
L4
MSRP: $2345|Avg: $1800
90%
#97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6799|Avg: $5500
87%
#98
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $6000
87%
#99
Tesla M40
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1099
85%
#100
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
79%
#205
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
3078%
#221
Quadro K500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#222
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
100%
#223
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
99%
#225
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
95%
#226
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
94%
#230
GRID T4-2Q
MSRP: $845|Avg: $600
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 1800M

#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
96%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
95%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
95%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
91%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
89%
#47
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
608%
#62
Quadro FX 1800M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
98%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
98%
#69
Radeon Pro W5500
MSRP: $399|Avg: $300
92%
#72
Quadro P2200
MSRP: $429|Avg: $227
90%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
90%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K500M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K500MQuadro FX 1800M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K500M and Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

The Quadro K500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 480 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 1800M

The Quadro FX 1800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 486 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K500M scores 480 and the Quadro FX 1800M reaches 486 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K500M is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 1800M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K500M) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1800M). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K500M) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1800M).

FeatureQuadro K500MQuadro FX 1800M
G3D Mark Score
480
486+1%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1536+540%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+281%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K500MQuadro FX 1800M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K500M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1800M has 1 GB. The Quadro K500M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K500M) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 1800M) — the Quadro K500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K500MQuadro FX 1800M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+300%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K500M draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 1800M's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The Quadro K500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K500M) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K500MQuadro FX 1800M
TDP
100W-47%
189W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
85
Perf/Watt
4.8+85%
2.6