Quadro K500M vs Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M315

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R5 M315 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R5 M315 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R5 M315: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K500M

2013

Why buy it

  • 72.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.

Radeon R5 M315

2016

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 72.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R5 M315 instead at 489 vs 480, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 M315 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M315 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K500M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R5 M315 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

The Quadro K500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 480 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K500M scores 480 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K500M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K500M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K500M) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315).

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score
480
489+2%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+380%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+259%
0.6592 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
128+540%
20
L1 Cache
128 KB+60%
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K500M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M315 carries 512 MB. Quadro K500M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K500M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M315. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K500M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M315) — the Quadro K500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K500M draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon R5 M315 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K500M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R5 M315
TDP
100W
75W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Perf/Watt
4.8
6.5+35%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M315 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R5 M315
MSRP
$150
Codename
GK104
Jet
Release
July 23 2013
May 15 2016
Ranking
#562
#922

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.