Quadro K500M vs Radeon R4E

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

2013Core: 771 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R4E

2017Core: 1183 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R4E Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R4E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R4E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K500M

2013

Why buy it

  • 27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Radeon R4E

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K500M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K500M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 27.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R4E instead at 487 vs 480, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R4E makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R4E is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K500M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K500M vs Radeon R4E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K500M

The Quadro K500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 480 points.

AMD

Radeon R4E

The Radeon R4E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 487 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K500M scores 480 and the Radeon R4E reaches 487 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K500M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R4E uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K500M) vs 384 (Radeon R4E). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K500M) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4E).

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R4E
G3D Mark Score
480
487+1%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+161%
0.9085 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+433%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R4E
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K500M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R4E carries 512 MB. Quadro K500M gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K500M and 64-bit on the Radeon R4E.

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R4E
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K500M draws 100W versus the Radeon R4E's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon R4E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K500M) vs 350W (Radeon R4E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R4E
TDP
100W
50W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Perf/Watt
4.8
9.7+102%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R4E (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K500MRadeon R4E
MSRP
$100
Codename
GK104
Lexa
Release
July 23 2013
April 20 2017
Ranking
#562
#773

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.