Quadro K510M
VS
GRID K1

Quadro K510M vs GRID K1

NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

2013Core: 771 MHz
VS

GRID K1

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K510M is positioned at rank 332 and the GRID K1 is on rank 410, so the Quadro K510M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K510M

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
82%
#317
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11541%
#332
Quadro K510M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#333
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
100%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
99%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
99%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
98%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
97%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
96%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
91%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
90%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
84%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
84%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
83%
#346
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
81%
#347
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
80%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K1

#394
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
92331%
#409
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
100%
#410
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
100%
#412
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
75%
#413
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
63%
#416
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
56%
#417
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
50%
#418
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
50%
#419
Quadro FX 1000
MSRP: $500|Avg: $30
44%
#420
Quadro FX 1300
MSRP: $599|Avg: $15
38%
#421
Quadro FX 3400/4400
MSRP: $1799|Avg: $50
38%
#422
Quadro FX 4000
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $50
31%
#423
RADEON IGP 320
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
25%
#424
Quadro FX 500/FX 600
MSRP: $449|Avg: $15
13%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K1 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K510M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro K510MGRID K1
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%)
Leading raw performance (+1.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID K1 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K510M and GRID K1

NVIDIA

Quadro K510M

The Quadro K510M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 641 points.

NVIDIA

GRID K1

The GRID K1 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 651 points. Launch price was $5,199.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K510M scores 641 and the GRID K1 reaches 651 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K510M is built on Kepler while the GRID K1 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K510M) vs 1,536 (GRID K1). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K510M) vs 2.289 TFLOPS ×2 (GRID K1).

FeatureQuadro K510MGRID K1
G3D Mark Score
641
651+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1536 ×2
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+3%
2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
32
32 ×2
TMUs
128
128 ×2
L1 Cache
128 KB
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K510MGRID K1
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K510M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K1 has 512 MB. The Quadro K510M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro K510MGRID K1
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K510M draws 100W versus the GRID K1's 225W — a 76.9% difference. The Quadro K510M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K510M) vs 350W (GRID K1). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro K510MGRID K1
TDP
100W-56%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
6.4+121%
2.9