Quadro K600
VS
GeForce GT 340

Quadro K600 vs GeForce GT 340

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

2013Core: 797 MHzBoost: 902 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

2014Core: 993 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K600 is positioned at rank 240 and the GeForce GT 340 is on rank 170, so the GeForce GT 340 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K600

#102
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
MSRP: $4399|Avg: $3500
88%
#103
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $4999
81%
#104
Radeon Pro W6900X
MSRP: $6000|Avg: $5000
80%
#105
Quadro RTX 6000
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1800
78%
#225
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
4070%
#240
Quadro K600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
100%
#241
FirePro S7000
MSRP: $1249|Avg: $40
100%
#242
Quadro P5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $400
99%
#243
FirePro V7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $100
97%
#244
Quadro P500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
91%
#246
FireStream 9370
MSRP: $800|Avg: $50
87%
#247
GRID K260Q
MSRP: $937|Avg: $15
87%
#249
Quadro 600
MSRP: $179|Avg: $20
80%
#251
Quadro 410
MSRP: $149|Avg: $25
79%
#253
FirePro W600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $30
78%
#254
L2
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $1500
75%
#255
Quadro K5200
MSRP: $2250|Avg: $70
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 340

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
983%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
944%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
933%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
932%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
930%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
925%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
913%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
909%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
901%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
899%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
888%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
886%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
870%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
869%
#92
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
98%
#93
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
95%
#94
Radeon Ryzen 5 5600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
92%
#95
Radeon Ryzen 5 5500U
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
91%
#155
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1084%
#170
GeForce GT 340
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#171
GeForce GT 230
MSRP: $44|Avg: $44
99%
#172
Radeon HD 6670
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
99%
#175
Radeon R5 420
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
97%
#176
Radeon R7 A8-7670K
MSRP: $118|Avg: $50
97%
#177
Radeon HD 6570
MSRP: $79|Avg: $79
95%
#178
Radeon HD 8370D
MSRP: $45|Avg: $10
95%
#181
Radeon HD 8310E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#183
GeForce GT 610
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
92%
#185
Radeon HD 6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 340 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K600.

InsightQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Leading raw performance (+2.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GT 340 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 340 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.2% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2.2%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K600 and GeForce GT 340

NVIDIA

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 340

The GeForce GT 340 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 738 points. Launch price was $89.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K600 scores 722 and the GeForce GT 340 reaches 738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K600 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 340 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K600) vs 384 (GeForce GT 340). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 340).

FeatureQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
G3D Mark Score
722
738+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
2880+650%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.196 TFLOPS+581%
0.7626 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
240+650%
32
L1 Cache
240 KB+650%
32 KB
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 340) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+500%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K600 draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 340's 64W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 340 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K600) vs 300W (GeForce GT 340). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

FeatureQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
TDP
225W
64W-72%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
3.2
11.5+259%
💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro K600 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 340 launched at $100 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (Quadro K600) vs 36.9 (GeForce GT 340) — the GeForce GT 340 offers 2.2% better value. The GeForce GT 340 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K600GeForce GT 340
MSRP
$199
$100-50%
Avg Price (30d)
$20
$20
Performance per Dollar
36.1
36.9+2%
Codename
GK110B
GK107
Release
July 23 2013
May 29 2014
Ranking
#318
#777