
Quadro K600 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870

Quadro K600
Popular choices:

Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K600 is positioned at rank 240 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is on rank 621, so the Quadro K600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K600
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 4870
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon HD 4870.
| Insight | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 0.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K600 and Mobility Radeon HD 4870

Quadro K600
The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Mobility Radeon HD 4870
The Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 720 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K600 scores 722 and the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 reaches 720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K600 is built on Kepler while the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K600) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 4870). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 4870).
| Feature | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 722 | 720 |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+260% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+490% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+500% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+50% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 4870) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K600 draws 225W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 4870's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 4870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K600) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 4870). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 30W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 24.0+650% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K600 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the Mobility Radeon HD 4870 launched at $299 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (Quadro K600) vs 36.0 (Mobility Radeon HD 4870) — the Quadro K600 offers 0.3% better value. The Quadro K600 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Quadro K600 | Mobility Radeon HD 4870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-33% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1 | 36.0 |
| Codename | GK110B | M98 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #318 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















