
Quadro K600 vs GeForce GT 740A

Quadro K600
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 740A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K600 is positioned at rank 240 and the GeForce GT 740A is on rank 157, so the GeForce GT 740A offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K600
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 740A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 740A.
| Insight | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro K600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro K600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $20), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K600 and GeForce GT 740A

Quadro K600
The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

GeForce GT 740A
The GeForce GT 740A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 710 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K600 scores 722 and the GeForce GT 740A reaches 710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K600 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 740A uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K600) vs 384 (GeForce GT 740A). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 740A).
| Feature | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 722+2% | 710 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+650% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.196 TFLOPS+581% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 240+650% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB+650% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K600 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 740A has 512 MB. The Quadro K600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce GT 740A) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K600 draws 225W versus the GeForce GT 740A's 64W — a 111.4% difference. The GeForce GT 740A is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K600) vs 250W (GeForce GT 740A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 64W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 3.2 | 11.1+247% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K600 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GT 740A launched at $89 and now averages $20. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 36.1 (Quadro K600) vs 35.5 (GeForce GT 740A) — the Quadro K600 offers 1.7% better value. The GeForce GT 740A is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K600 | GeForce GT 740A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $89-55% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.1+2% | 35.5 |
| Codename | GK110B | GK107 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #318 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















