Quadro K610M vs Intel UHD Graphics 615
Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K610M is positioned at rank 170 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 is on rank 412, so the Quadro K610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K610M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro K610M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 615 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K610M and Intel UHD Graphics 615
Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K610M scores 714 and the Intel UHD Graphics 615 reaches 717 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K610M is built on Maxwell while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 uses Generation 9.5, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K610M) vs 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M) vs 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 714 | 717 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+100% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+114% | 0.4032 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+7% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 8+167% | 3 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K610M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Intel UHD Graphics 615 has 0 MB. The Quadro K610M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K610M draws 30W versus the Intel UHD Graphics 615's 15W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K610M) vs 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W | 15W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.8 | 47.8+101% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Intel UHD Graphics 615 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Codename | GM108 | Amber Lake GT2 |
| Release | March 1 2015 | November 7 2018 |
| Ranking | #842 | #921 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K610M and Intel UHD Graphics 615
