Quadro K610M vs Radeon HD 6670
Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 6670
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K610M is positioned at rank 170 and the Radeon HD 6670 is on rank 172, so the Quadro K610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6670
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6670 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K610M.
| Insight | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6670 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K610M and Radeon HD 6670
Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Radeon HD 6670
The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K610M scores 714 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K610M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K610M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 714 | 725+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1536+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+213% |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz+28% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 96+500% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K610M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 6670 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K610M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the Quadro K610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K610M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K610M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-88% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 23.8+721% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K610M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | Quadro K610M | Radeon HD 6670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $99 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $99 |
| Codename | GM108 | Cayman |
| Release | March 1 2015 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #842 | #596 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro K610M and Radeon HD 6670
