Quadro K610M vs Radeon HD 6670

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K610M vs Radeon HD 6670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K610M vs Radeon HD 6670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K610M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 250W, a 220W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6670

2010

Why buy it

✅37.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌733.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 37.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (725 vs 714), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6670 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K610M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K610M vs Radeon HD 6670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K610M

The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.

Radeon HD 6670

The Radeon HD 6670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 725 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K610M scores 714 and the Radeon HD 6670 reaches 725 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K610M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 6670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K610M) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6670). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6670). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 880 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K610M	Radeon HD 6670
G3D Mark Score	714	725+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 3
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1536+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8632 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+213%
Boost Clock	1124 MHz+28%	880 MHz
ROPs	8	32+300%
TMUs	16	96+500%
L1 Cache	128 KB	192 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K610M	Radeon HD 6670
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K610M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6670 carries 2 GB. Radeon HD 6670 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K610M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6670. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K610M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6670) — the Quadro K610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K610M	Radeon HD 6670
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K610M draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6670's 250W — a 157.1% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K610M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 6670). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro K610M	Radeon HD 6670
TDP	30W-88%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	250W-29%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	23.8+721%	2.9

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K610M (2015 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro K610M	Radeon HD 6670
MSRP	—	$99
Codename	GM108	Cayman
Release	March 1 2015	December 14 2010
Ranking	#842	#596

Search Quadro K610M on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.