Quadro K600 vs Quadro K610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K600 vs Quadro K610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K600 vs Quadro K610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K600

2013

Why buy it

✅43.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.

Quadro K610M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2015 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (722 vs 714), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro K600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K600 vs Quadro K610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K600

The Quadro K600 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 722 points. Launch price was $5,265.

Quadro K610M

The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K600 scores 722 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K600 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Quadro K600) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K600) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 902 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Quadro K600	Quadro K610M
G3D Mark Score	722+1%	714
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2880+650%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.196 TFLOPS+502%	0.8632 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	902 MHz	1124 MHz+25%
ROPs	48+500%	8
TMUs	240+1400%	16
L1 Cache	240 KB+88%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K600	Quadro K610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K600 and 64-bit on the Quadro K610M. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro K600) vs 1 MB (Quadro K610M) — the Quadro K600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K600	Quadro K610M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K600 draws 225W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K600) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K600	Quadro K610M
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	3.2	23.8+644%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K610M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro K600	Quadro K610M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GK110B	GM108
Release	July 23 2013	March 1 2015
Ranking	#318	#842

Search Quadro K600 on Amazon

Search Quadro K610M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.