
Quadro K420 vs Quadro K610M

Quadro K420
Popular choices:

Quadro K610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K420 is positioned at rank 220 and the Quadro K610M is on rank 170, so the Quadro K610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K420
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K420 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K610M.
| Insight | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K420 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K420 and Quadro K610M

Quadro K420
The Quadro K420 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 726 points. Launch price was $854.99.

Quadro K610M
The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K420 scores 726 and the Quadro K610M reaches 714 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K420 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K610M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (Quadro K420) vs 384 (Quadro K610M). Raw compute: 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K420) vs 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M). Boost clocks: 784 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 726+2% | 714 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+250% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.107 TFLOPS+144% | 0.8632 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 784 MHz | 1124 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 112+600% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 128 KB+14% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 1 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K420) vs 1 MB (Quadro K610M) — the Quadro K610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K420 draws 108W versus the Quadro K610M's 30W — a 113% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K420) vs 350W (Quadro K610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W | 30W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 6.7 | 23.8+255% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro K610M is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro K420 | Quadro K610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GM108 |
| Release | July 22 2014 | March 1 2015 |
| Ranking | #475 | #842 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















