Quadro K610M
VS
GeForce RTX 3060

Quadro K610M vs GeForce RTX 3060

NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro K610M is positioned at rank #170 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K610M

#75
Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP: $2199|Avg: $1800
99%
#76
Radeon PRO W7900
MSRP: $3999|Avg: $3500
99%
#77
Radeon Pro VII
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1400
98%
#78
Quadro RTX 5000
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
94%
#79
Quadro RTX 5000 (móvel)
MSRP: $2299|Avg: $692
94%
#80
Radeon Pro W6800X
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
90%
#155
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2069%
#170
Quadro K610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#173
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP: $119|Avg: $86
98%
#175
Radeon Pro 560
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#176
Radeon Pro 460
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
97%
#180
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700E
MSRP: $139|Avg: $85
93%
#181
FirePro M5950
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
92%
#183
Radeon Pro WX 7130
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $200
90%
#184
FirePro W7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $114
89%
#185
P106-090
MSRP: $389|Avg: $30
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060

#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
109%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
108%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
107%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
105%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
105%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
104%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
103%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
102%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
102%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
102%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
101%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
101%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
101%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
100%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
100%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
100%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
99%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
96%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
95%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
95%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
94%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
94%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
93%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
92%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
92%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
91%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
90%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
89%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K610M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2280.3% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (12 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro K610M.

InsightQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2280.3%)
Leading raw performance (+2280.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K610M and GeForce RTX 3060

NVIDIA

Quadro K610M

The Quadro K610M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 1 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 714 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro K610M scores 714 versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 16,995 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 2280.3%. The Quadro K610M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce RTX 3060 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K610M) vs 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (Quadro K610M) vs 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1777 MHz.

FeatureQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
G3D Mark Score
714
16,995+2280%
Architecture
Maxwell
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
384
3584+833%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS
12.74 TFLOPS+1376%
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1777 MHz+58%
ROPs
8
48+500%
TMUs
16
112+600%
L1 Cache
0.13 MB
3.5 MB+2592%
L2 Cache
1 MB
3 MB+200%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K610M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro K610M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
12 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
1 MB
3 MB+200%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K610M draws 30W versus the GeForce RTX 3060's 170W — a 140% difference. The Quadro K610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K610M) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 3060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin.

FeatureQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
TDP
30W-82%
170W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
23.8
100.0+320%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro K610MGeForce RTX 3060
MSRP
$329
Avg Price (30d)
$289
Codename
GM108
GA106
Release
March 1 2015
January 12 2021
Ranking
#842
#114