Quadro M1000M
VS
Quadro K1200

Quadro M1000M vs Quadro K1200

NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1072 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

2015Core: 954 MHzBoost: 1033 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M1000M is positioned at rank 49 and the Quadro K1200 is on rank 142, so the Quadro M1000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M1000M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
97%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
96%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
96%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
88%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
87%
#34
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
519%
#49
Quadro M1000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
99%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
98%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
97%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
88%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
88%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
84%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1200

#70
Radeon PRO W6800
MSRP: $2249|Avg: $2249
91%
#72
Quadro P4200
MSRP: $1200|Avg: $110
88%
#127
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
1495%
#142
Quadro K1200
MSRP: $300|Avg: $184
100%
#143
Quadro P400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $60
99%
#144
Radeon Pro WX 7100
MSRP: $799|Avg: $180
98%
#145
Quadro M520
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
97%
#146
Radeon Sky 500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#147
Quadro M5000
MSRP: $999|Avg: $120
95%
#148
Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP: $399|Avg: $85
93%
#149
Quadro P4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $819|Avg: $290
93%
#151
FirePro M40003
MSRP: $150|Avg: $72
92%
#152
Radeon Pro 465
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
92%
#154
Tesla P4
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $190
91%
#155
Radeon Pro WX 4150
MSRP: $300|Avg: $120
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M1000M.

InsightQuadro M1000MQuadro K1200
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%)
Leading raw performance (+4.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K1200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1000M and Quadro K1200

NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1200

The Quadro K1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 28 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 954 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,965 points. Launch price was $321.97.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1000M scores 2,845 and the Quadro K1200 reaches 2,965 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1000M is built on Maxwell while the Quadro K1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M1000M) vs 512 (Quadro K1200). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M) vs 1.0578 TFLOPS (Quadro K1200). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 1033 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M1000MQuadro K1200
G3D Mark Score
2,845
2,965+4%
Architecture
Maxwell
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.017 TFLOPS
1.0578 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock
1072 MHz+4%
1033 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M1000MQuadro K1200
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureQuadro M1000MQuadro K1200
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1000M draws 40W versus the Quadro K1200's 45W — a 11.8% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1000M) vs 350W (Quadro K1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M1000MQuadro K1200
TDP
40W-11%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
71.1+8%
65.9