Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 260

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 260 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 260: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M1000M

2015

Why buy it

✅23.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 40W instead of 95W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $109 MSRP).

Radeon R7 260

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($109 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M1000M across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌137.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro M1000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.0% in average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 260 instead at 2,892 vs 2,845, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro M1000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 260 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 260 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M1000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M1000M vs Radeon R7 260 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Radeon R7 260

The Radeon R7 260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 17 2013. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1100 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,892 points. Launch price was $109.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1000M scores 2,845 and the Radeon R7 260 reaches 2,892 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R7 260 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M1000M) vs 768 (Radeon R7 260). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 260). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M1000M	Radeon R7 260
G3D Mark Score	2,845	2,892+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	768+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.017 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+51%
Boost Clock	1072 MHz	1100 MHz+3%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	256 KB+33%	192 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M1000M	Radeon R7 260
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M1000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 260 carries 1 GB. Quadro M1000M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 260. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 260) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M1000M	Radeon R7 260
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1000M draws 40W versus the Radeon R7 260's 95W — a 81.5% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1000M) vs 400W (Radeon R7 260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro M1000M	Radeon R7 260
TDP	40W-58%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	71.1+134%	30.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M1000M (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	Quadro M1000M	Radeon R7 260
MSRP	—	$109
Codename	GM107	Bonaire
Release	August 18 2015	December 17 2013
Ranking	#594	#591

Search Quadro M1000M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 260 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.