FirePro W5000 vs Quadro M1000M

FirePro W5000

2012Core: 825 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

2015Core: 993 MHzBoost: 1072 MHz
Similar parts

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro M1000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro M1000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro W5000

2012

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.

Quadro M1000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro W5000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.3% in PassMark G3D (2,967 vs 2,845), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro W5000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
FirePro W5000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

FirePro W5000 vs Quadro M1000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro W5000

The FirePro W5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 825 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,967 points. Launch price was $599.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1000M

The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.

Graphics Performance

The FirePro W5000 scores 2,967 and the Quadro M1000M reaches 2,845 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro W5000 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro M1000M uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (FirePro W5000) vs 512 (Quadro M1000M). Raw compute: 1.267 TFLOPS (FirePro W5000) vs 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M).

FeatureFirePro W5000Quadro M1000M
G3D Mark Score
2,967+4%
2,845
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+50%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.267 TFLOPS+25%
1.017 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+50%
32
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureFirePro W5000Quadro M1000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro W5000 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1000M carries 4 GB. Quadro M1000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro W5000 and 64-bit on the Quadro M1000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (FirePro W5000) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro W5000Quadro M1000M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro W5000 draws 75W versus the Quadro M1000M's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro M1000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro W5000) vs 350W (Quadro M1000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureFirePro W5000Quadro M1000M
TDP
75W
40W-47%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
183mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
39.6
71.1+80%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M1000M (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureFirePro W5000Quadro M1000M
MSRP
$599
Codename
Pitcairn
GM107
Release
August 7 2012
August 18 2015
Ranking
#585
#594

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.