Quadro M1000M vs GeForce MX350
Quadro M1000M
Popular choices:
GeForce MX350
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M1000M is positioned at rank 49 and the GeForce MX350 is on rank 348, so the Quadro M1000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M1000M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX350
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX350 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce MX350 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M1000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M1000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX350.
| Insight | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M1000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1000M and GeForce MX350
Quadro M1000M
The Quadro M1000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1072 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,845 points. Launch price was $200.89.
GeForce MX350
The GeForce MX350 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 747 MHz to 937 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 20W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,828 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1000M scores 2,845 and the GeForce MX350 reaches 2,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1000M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce MX350 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro M1000M) vs 640 (GeForce MX350). Raw compute: 1.017 TFLOPS (Quadro M1000M) vs 1.199 TFLOPS (GeForce MX350). Boost clocks: 1072 MHz vs 937 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,845 | 2,828 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.017 TFLOPS | 1.199 TFLOPS+18% |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz+14% | 937 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+7% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1000M comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX350 has 2 GB. The Quadro M1000M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1000M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce MX350) — the Quadro M1000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1000M draws 40W versus the GeForce MX350's 20W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce MX350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1000M) vs 350W (GeForce MX350). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 20W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 71.1 | 141.4+99% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX350 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro M1000M | GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | GM107 | GP107 |
| Release | August 18 2015 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #594 | #597 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M1000M and GeForce MX350
