
Quadro M1200 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 213.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M1200.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-213.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+213.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $60), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 108.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+108.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and GeForce GTX 1060

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 213.3%. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212 | 10,064+213% |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 2560+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+534% |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | 1733 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 40 | 160+300% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 960 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC (Pascal). Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP8 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 120% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-75% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | — | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+28% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 1060 launched at $249 and now averages $60. The Quadro M1200 costs 33.3% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Quadro M1200) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 108.8% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-33% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3 | 167.7+109% |
| Codename | GM107 | GP104 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #567 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















