
Quadro M1200 vs FirePro V7000

Quadro M1200
Popular choices:

FirePro V7000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M1200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the FirePro V7000.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro M1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $100), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 154% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+154%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and FirePro V7000

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

FirePro V7000
The FirePro V7000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 950 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points. Launch price was $1,249.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the FirePro V7000 reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the FirePro V7000 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7000). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 2.432 TFLOPS (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212+2% | 3,162 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 1280+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS+74% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 80+100% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7000) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 12 (FirePro V7000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro V7000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (FirePro V7000).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP8 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the FirePro V7000's 150W — a 107.7% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (FirePro V7000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-70% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 242mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | 75°C-9% |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+238% | 21.1 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the FirePro V7000 launched at $899 and now averages $100. The Quadro M1200 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Quadro M1200) vs 31.6 (FirePro V7000) — the Quadro M1200 offers 154.1% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | FirePro V7000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 80.3+154% | 31.6 |
| Codename | GM107 | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 11 2017 | August 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #567 | #462 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












