Quadro M1200 vs Radeon 660M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 660M

#389

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1349%

#391

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

1223%

#392

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

1219%

#396

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1109%

#397

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1101%

#399

Radeon 660M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#400

Radeon R9 M290X

MSRP: $400|Avg: $60

100%

#401

Radeon HD 7670

MSRP: $100|Avg: $25

100%

#402

Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#403

Mobility Radeon HD 5000

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#404

Iris Pro Graphics 5200

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#406

Radeon RX Vega 10 Ryzen 7 3700C

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

97%

#407

Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

#408

Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#409

GeForce GTX 285M SLI

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

91%

#410

Radeon R7 M260X

MSRP: $139|Avg: $35

91%

#411

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6570 Dual

MSRP: $120|Avg: $25

90%

#412

Intel UHD Graphics 615

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

89%

#413

Radeon R7 A365

MSRP: $109|Avg: $55

89%

#414

Radeon 3015e

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 660M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Radeon 660M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M1200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M1200	Radeon 660M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M1200 Benchmark Check

Radeon 660M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and Radeon 660M

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Radeon 660M

The Radeon 660M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,221 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Radeon 660M reaches 3,221 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 660M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 384 (Radeon 660M). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 660M). Boost clocks: 1150 MHz vs 1900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M1200	Radeon 660M
G3D Mark Score	3,212	3,221
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	640+67%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.399 TFLOPS	1.459 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock	1150 MHz	1900 MHz+65%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+67%	24
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M1200	Radeon 660M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 660M has 2 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro M1200	Radeon 660M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Radeon 660M's 40W — a 11.8% difference. The Radeon 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Radeon 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.