GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro M1200

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013Core: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
···

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro M1200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro M1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro M1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

  • 12.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 755M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 755M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (3,280 vs 3,212), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 755M SLI makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Quadro M1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 640 (Quadro M1200).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
G3D Mark Score
3,280+2%
3,212
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768+20%
640

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M1200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro M1200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and 64-bit on the Quadro M1200.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.1 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.1
4.5+10%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
Encoder
NVENC (1st Gen)
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,HEVC,VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 183% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 90°C vs 82°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
TDP
2W-96%
45W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
90°C
82°C-9%
Perf/Watt
1640.0+2197%
71.4
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the Quadro M1200 launched at $0. On MSRP, Quadro M1200 was 100+% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs Infinity (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GT 755M SLIQuadro M1200
MSRP
$200
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
16.4
Infinity
Codename
N14P-?
GM107
Release
November 1 2013
January 11 2017
Ranking
#554
#567

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.