Quadro K5100M vs Quadro M1200

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

2013Core: 771 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz

Quadro K5100M vs Quadro M1200 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5100M vs Quadro M1200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5100M vs Quadro M1200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 54.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 122.2% higher power demand at 100W vs 45W.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 100W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro K5100M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro K5100M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 54.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (3,264 vs 3,212), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K5100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro K5100M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K5100M vs Quadro M1200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5100M scores 3,264 and the Quadro M1200 reaches 3,212 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5100M is built on Kepler while the Quadro M1200 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5100M) vs 640 (Quadro M1200). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M) vs 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200).

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
G3D Mark Score
3,264+2%
3,212
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+140%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.369 TFLOPS+69%
1.399 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
128+220%
40
L1 Cache
128 KB
320 KB+150%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5100M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M1200 carries 4 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M and 64-bit on the Quadro M1200. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Quadro K5100M) vs 2 MB (Quadro M1200) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+100%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K5100M) vs 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Vulkan
1.2+9%
1.1
OpenGL
4.6+2%
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Kepler) (Quadro K5100M) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP5 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K5100M) vs H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200).

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC (Kepler)
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP5
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,HEVC,VP8
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5100M draws 100W versus the Quadro M1200's 45W — a 75.9% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5100M) vs 350W (Quadro M1200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82°C.

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
TDP
100W
45W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
82°C-4%
Perf/Watt
32.6
71.4+119%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureQuadro K5100MQuadro M1200
MSRP
$0
Codename
GK104
GM107
Release
July 23 2013
January 11 2017
Ranking
#562
#567

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.