Quadro M1200 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 755M SLI

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

94%

#275

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

662%

#277

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

600%

#278

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

599%

#282

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

544%

#283

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

541%

#285

GeForce GT 755M SLI

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

100%

#287

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

100%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

98%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

97%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

96%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

94%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M1200 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M1200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M1200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $50), it costs 20% less, resulting in a 22.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+22.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro M1200 Benchmark Check

GeForce GT 755M SLI Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M1200 and GeForce GT 755M SLI

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the GeForce GT 755M SLI reaches 3,280 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 755M SLI uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
G3D Mark Score	3,212	3,280+2%
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	640	768+20%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M1200 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB. The Quadro M1200 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Vulkan	1.1	1.2+9%
OpenGL	4.5+10%	4.1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M1200) vs NVENC (1st Gen) (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 755M SLI).

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
Encoder	3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)	NVENC (1st Gen)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP6	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP8	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the GeForce GT 755M SLI's 2W — a 183% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 90°C.

Feature	Quadro M1200	GeForce GT 755M SLI
TDP	45W	2W-96%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	82°C-9%	90°C
Perf/Watt	71.4	1640.0+2197%

💰

Value Analysis

The Quadro M1200 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GT 755M SLI launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Quadro M1200 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 80.3 (Quadro M1200) vs 65.6 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) — the Quadro M1200 offers 22.4% better value. The Quadro M1200 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).