Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8870PCIe

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz
Similar parts
····
VS
AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014Core: 575 MHzBoost: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8870PCIe Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8870PCIe FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8870PCIe: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 75.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • 48.6% higher power demand at 55W vs 37W.

Radeon E8870PCIe

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 37W instead of 55W, a 18W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M2000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M2000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 75.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.2% in PassMark G3D (3,410 vs 3,368), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M2000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon E8870PCIe makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon E8870PCIe is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M2000M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon E8870PCIe Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

AMD

Radeon E8870PCIe

The Radeon E8870PCIe is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 25 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 575 MHz to 625 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 37W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,368 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the Radeon E8870PCIe reaches 3,368 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon E8870PCIe uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 640 (Radeon E8870PCIe). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M) vs 0.8 TFLOPS (Radeon E8870PCIe). Boost clocks: 1098 MHz vs 625 MHz.

FeatureQuadro M2000MRadeon E8870PCIe
G3D Mark Score
3,410+1%
3,368
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
640
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS+76%
0.8 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1098 MHz+76%
625 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
40
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2000MRadeon E8870PCIe
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E8870PCIe carries 2 GB. Quadro M2000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000M and 64-bit on the Radeon E8870PCIe. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M2000M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon E8870PCIe) — the Quadro M2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M2000MRadeon E8870PCIe
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon E8870PCIe's 37W — a 39.1% difference. The Radeon E8870PCIe is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 350W (Radeon E8870PCIe). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M2000MRadeon E8870PCIe
TDP
55W
37W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
62.0
91.0+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M2000M (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureQuadro M2000MRadeon E8870PCIe
MSRP
$250
Codename
GM107
Venus
Release
December 3 2015
January 25 2014
Ranking
#550
#734

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.