Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Quadro M2000M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

2015Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1098 MHz
Similar parts
····
Buy on Amazon
VS

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

Quadro M2000M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Performance Spectrum

Quadro M2000M
4 GB 55
3,410
+0.6%
brand logoGeForce GTX 570M
brand logoGeForce GTX 460
brand logoGeForce GTX 465
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoGeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
2 GB 30
3,390
0.0%
brand logoRadeon R7 450
brand logoRadeon HD 6970M
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon HD 6990
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
brand logoRadeon RX 6600 XT
brand logoGeForce RTX 5060

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2000M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2000M

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 33.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

2020

Why buy it

  • ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • ✅Quadro M2000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • ✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M2000M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,410 vs 3,390), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 10nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro M2000M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro M2000M vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. It has 96 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,390 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 reaches 3,390 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 uses Gen. 11 Ice Lake, both on 28 nm vs 10 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 96 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
G3D Mark Score
3,410
3,390
Architecture
Maxwell
Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Process Node
28 nm
10 nm
Shading Units
640+567%
96
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M2000M has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 carries 2 GB. Quadro M2000M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000M and 64-bit on the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7.

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M2000M) vs 12.1 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12.1
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M) vs QuickSync (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2 (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7).

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Encoder
4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
QuickSync
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
QuickSync
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 350W (Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
TDP
55W
30W-45%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
—
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
62.0
113.0+82%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 (2020 vs 2015).

FeatureQuadro M2000MTiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
MSRP
—
$100
Codename
GM107
Tiger Lake Xe
Release
December 3 2015
August 15 2020
Ranking
#550
#508
Search Quadro M2000M on AmazonSearch Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.