Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 560X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M2000M

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 75W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 25.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Radeon RX 560X

2018

Why buy it

✅24.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 25.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅Quadro M2000M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560X is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌36.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 55W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 560X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro M2000M instead at 3,410 vs 3,340, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) and FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Quadro M2000M is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 560X makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro M2000M vs Radeon RX 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M2000M

The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.

Radeon RX 560X

The Radeon RX 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 11 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,340 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M2000M scores 3,410 and the Radeon RX 560X reaches 3,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M2000M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon RX 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M2000M) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560X). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560X). Boost clocks: 1098 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	Radeon RX 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,410+2%	3,340
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	640	1024+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	2.611 TFLOPS+86%
Boost Clock	1098 MHz	1275 MHz+16%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560X is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M2000M does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	Radeon RX 560X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M2000M and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M2000M) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560X) — the Quadro M2000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	Radeon RX 560X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	256-bit+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M2000M draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 560X's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M2000M) vs 400W (Radeon RX 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	Quadro M2000M	Radeon RX 560X
TDP	55W-27%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W-13%	400W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	62.0+39%	44.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 560X (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	Quadro M2000M	Radeon RX 560X
MSRP	—	$129
Codename	GM107	Polaris 21
Release	December 3 2015	April 11 2018
Ranking	#550	#556

Search Quadro M2000M on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 560X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.