
Quadro M5000 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Quadro M5000
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro M5000 is positioned at rank #147 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5000
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M5000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 780 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $42 (vs $120), it costs 65% less, resulting in a 187.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+187.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($42) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5000 and GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 7 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 875 MHz to 928 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,469 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5000 scores 9,406 and the GeForce GTX 780 Ti reaches 9,469 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5000 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5000) vs 2,880 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Raw compute: 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000) vs 5.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Boost clocks: 1038 MHz vs 928 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,406 | 9,469 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2880+41% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.252 TFLOPS | 5.345 TFLOPS+26% |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz+12% | 928 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128 | 240+88% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+220% | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti has 3 GB. The Quadro M5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 211 GB/s (Quadro M5000) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — a 59.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 780 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5000) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the Quadro M5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+167% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 211 GB/s | 336 GB/s+59% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro M5000) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000) vs NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 1st gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti).
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 1st gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 1st gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5000 draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 780 Ti's 250W — a 50% difference. The Quadro M5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro M5000) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 780 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-4% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.7+65% | 37.9 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M5000 launched at $999 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce GTX 780 Ti launched at $699 and now averages $42. The GeForce GTX 780 Ti costs 65% less ($78 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 78.4 (Quadro M5000) vs 225.5 (GeForce GTX 780 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 780 Ti offers 187.6% better value. The Quadro M5000 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro M5000 | GeForce GTX 780 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $999 | $699-30% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $42-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 78.4 | 225.5+188% |
| Codename | GM204 | GK110B |
| Release | June 29 2015 | November 7 2013 |
| Ranking | #280 | #278 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















