
Quadro M5500 vs Radeon Pro 580

Quadro M5500
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 580
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro M5500 is positioned at rank 141 and the Radeon Pro 580 is on rank 93, so the Radeon Pro 580 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M5500
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 580
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro M5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 580.
| Insight | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 580 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro 580 holds the technical lead. Priced at $150 (vs $200), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 30.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro M5500 and Radeon Pro 580

Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.

Radeon Pro 580
The Radeon Pro 580 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 5 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,753 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon Pro 580 reaches 7,753 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 580 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 580). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 5.53 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 580). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,915+2% | 7,753 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2304+13% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.772 TFLOPS | 5.53 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 1165 MHz | 1200 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 144+13% |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+33% | 576 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 580 has 4 GB. The Quadro M5500 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro 580). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro 580). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 580).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Maxwell) | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro 580's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon Pro 580 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 580). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8+2% | 51.7 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro M5500 launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro 580 launched at $500 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro 580 costs 25% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.6 (Quadro M5500) vs 51.7 (Radeon Pro 580) — the Radeon Pro 580 offers 30.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 580 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon Pro 580 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $500-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $150-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.6 | 51.7+31% |
| Codename | GM204 | Polaris 20 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | June 5 2017 |
| Ranking | #321 | #327 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















