Quadro M5500
Radeon RX 6400
Quadro M5500 vs Radeon RX 6400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M5500 vs Radeon RX 6400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro M5500 vs Radeon RX 6400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M5500
2016Why buy it
- ✅59.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌403.1% HIGHER MSRP$800 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.9 vs 48.6 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌183% higher power demand at 150W vs 53W.
Radeon RX 6400
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $641 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 391.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 48.6 vs 9.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 53W instead of 150W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M5500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M5500 vs Radeon RX 6400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro M5500
The Quadro M5500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1165 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,915 points.
Radeon RX 6400
The Radeon RX 6400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1923 MHz to 2321 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 53W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,728 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M5500 scores 7,915 and the Radeon RX 6400 reaches 7,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M5500 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6400 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Quadro M5500) vs 768 (Radeon RX 6400). Raw compute: 4.772 TFLOPS (Quadro M5500) vs 3.565 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6400). Boost clocks: 1165 MHz vs 2321 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,915+2% | 7,728 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+167% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.772 TFLOPS+34% | 3.565 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1165 MHz | 2321 MHz+99% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 6400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro M5500 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M5500 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6400 carries 4 GB. Quadro M5500 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro M5500 and 64-bit on the Radeon RX 6400. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M5500) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 6400) — the Quadro M5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro M5500) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6400). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M5500) vs None (Radeon RX 6400). Decoder: NVDEC (Maxwell) vs VCN 3.0 (Limited). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro M5500) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) (Radeon RX 6400).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Maxwell) | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Maxwell) | VCN 3.0 (Limited) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264 (Decode),HEVC (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M5500 draws 150W versus the Radeon RX 6400's 53W — a 95.6% difference. The Radeon RX 6400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M5500) vs 350W (Radeon RX 6400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 172mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 53W-65% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 172mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 52.8 | 145.8+176% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M5500 came in at $800, while the Radeon RX 6400 launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6400 was 80.1% cheaper ($641 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.9 (Quadro M5500) vs 48.6 (Radeon RX 6400) — the Radeon RX 6400 offers 390.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6400 (2022 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro M5500 | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800 | $159-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.9 | 48.6+391% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 24 |
| Release | April 8 2016 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #321 | #330 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro M5500 and Radeon RX 6400
