Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 135 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is on rank 65, so the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

97%

#119

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1388%

#134

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

100%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

100%

#138

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

94%

#139

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

94%

#140

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

93%

#141

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

93%

#142

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

92%

#143

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

91%

#144

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

90%

#145

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

89%

#146

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

89%

#147

Radeon Pro WX 4100

MSRP: $399|Avg: $85

87%

#148

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

MSRP: $819|Avg: $290

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

#19

Radeon RX 5600

MSRP: $229|Avg: $150

98%

#22

Radeon RX 7700

MSRP: $449|Avg: $399

94%

#55

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

206%

#57

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

187%

#58

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

187%

#62

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

170%

#63

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

169%

#65

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

100%

#66

GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

100%

#68

GeForce GTX 850M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40

97%

#78

Radeon HD 8970M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $170

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design.

Insight	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $200 for the Quadro P3000 (móvel), it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 97.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+97.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200)	✅More affordable ($100)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,309 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design reaches 6,309 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
G3D Mark Score	6,385+1%	6,309
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1280+25%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.11 TFLOPS+27%	2.458 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1215 MHz+1%	1200 MHz
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	80+25%	64
L1 Cache	0.47 MB	1 MB+113%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+50%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design's 50W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro P3000 (móvel)	GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
TDP	75W	50W-33%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	85.1	126.2+48%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design costs 50% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 63.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design offers 97.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).