
Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs P106-100

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

P106-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 135 and the P106-100 is on rank 43, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P106-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $200), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 592% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+592%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and P106-100

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the P106-100 reaches 6,628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the P106-100 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 1,920 (P106-100). Raw compute: 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100). Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,385 | 6,628+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 1920+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.11 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+114% |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz | 1733 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 80 | 120+50% |
| L1 Cache | 480 KB | 720 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 2 MB (P106-100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the P106-100's 75W — a 0% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (P106-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 250mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 85.1 | 88.4+4% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the P106-100 launched at $224 and now averages $30. The P106-100 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 220.9 (P106-100) — the P106-100 offers 592.5% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | P106-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $224-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $30-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.9 | 220.9+592% |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #380 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















