
Quadro P3000 (móvel) vs Quadro T1000

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Quadro T1000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is positioned at rank 135 and the Quadro T1000 is on rank 90, so the Quadro T1000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1000 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T1000 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T1000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P3000 (móvel).
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $200 versus $425 for the Quadro T1000, it costs 53% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 108.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+108.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($200) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($425) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P3000 (móvel) and Quadro T1000

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

Quadro T1000
The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) scores 6,385 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1215 MHz vs 1455 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,385 | 6,505+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Boost Clock | 1215 MHz | 1455 MHz+20% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 85.1 | 130.1+53% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400 and now averages $425. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) costs 52.9% less ($225 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 31.9 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) vs 15.3 (Quadro T1000) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) offers 108.5% better value. The Quadro T1000 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Quadro P3000 (móvel) | Quadro T1000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $600 | $400-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200-53% | $425 |
| Performance per Dollar | 31.9+108% | 15.3 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #380 | #376 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















