
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro P3000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro P3000 (móvel) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro P3000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Quadro P3000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P3000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅11.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro P3000 (móvel) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,574+3% | 6,385 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.458 TFLOPS | 3.11 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1215 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+113% | 0.47 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and 256-bit on the Quadro P3000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1.5 MB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 131.5+55% | 85.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $600 |
| Codename | TU117 | GP104 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #371 | #380 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














