GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design vs Quadro P3000 (mó...

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P3000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P3000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

2020

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅Less risky long-term buy than Quadro P3000 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while Quadro P3000 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design better than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 6,574 vs 6,385 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (50W vs 75W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2020 generation instead of 2017 and a 12nm process instead of 16nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is the smarter buy by a wide margin. GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Quadro P3000 (móvel) really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is Quadro P3000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. Quadro P3000 (móvel) is 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM, 6,385 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Benchmark Check

Quadro P3000 (móvel) Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	102 FPS	103 FPS
medium	87 FPS	88 FPS
high	73 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	43 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	89 FPS	90 FPS
medium	77 FPS	77 FPS
high	56 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	28 FPS	28 FPS
medium	27 FPS	27 FPS
high	18 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	15 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	177 FPS	219 FPS
medium	150 FPS	186 FPS
high	116 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	86 FPS	107 FPS
1440p
low	128 FPS	161 FPS
medium	104 FPS	132 FPS
high	83 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	86 FPS
medium	60 FPS	70 FPS
high	48 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	44 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	296 FPS	287 FPS
medium	237 FPS	230 FPS
high	197 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	148 FPS	144 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	215 FPS
medium	177 FPS	172 FPS
high	148 FPS	144 FPS
ultra	111 FPS	108 FPS
4K
low	148 FPS	144 FPS
medium	118 FPS	115 FPS
high	99 FPS	96 FPS
ultra	69 FPS	72 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
1080p
low	171 FPS	187 FPS
medium	142 FPS	154 FPS
high	125 FPS	137 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	120 FPS	127 FPS
medium	100 FPS	106 FPS
high	87 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	70 FPS	73 FPS
medium	57 FPS	59 FPS
high	46 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	33 FPS	34 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design Open Quadro P3000 (móvel)

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design and Quadro P3000 (móvel)

GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1035 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,574 points.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design scores 6,574 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 2.458 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1215 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score	6,574+3%	6,385
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Process Node	12 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1024	1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.458 TFLOPS	3.11 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock	1200 MHz	1215 MHz+1%
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	64	80+25%
L1 Cache	1 MB+113%	0.47 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the Quadro P3000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design	Quadro P3000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1.5 MB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design draws 50W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 Ti with Max-Q Design) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.