
P106-100
Popular choices:

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌167.9% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
P106-100
2017Quadro P3000 (móvel)
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $376 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 178.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 10.6 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌167.9% HIGHER MSRP$600 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 10.6 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is P106-100 better than Quadro P3000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P3000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 138 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 127 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 208 FPS |
| medium | 216 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 173 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 143 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 80 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 298 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 239 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 199 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 149 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 224 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 179 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 63 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 90 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 28 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and Quadro P3000 (móvel)

P106-100
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Quadro P3000 (móvel)
Quadro P3000 (móvel)
The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1088 MHz to 1215 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,385 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Quadro P3000 (móvel) reaches 6,385 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,280 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.11 TFLOPS (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1215 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628+4% | 6,385 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+50% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+114% | 3.11 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+43% | 1215 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+50% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+50% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro P3000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P3000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro P3000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4+4% | 85.1 |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP, while the Quadro P3000 (móvel) launched at $600. The P106-100 costs 62.7% less ($376 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.6 (P106-100) vs 10.6 (Quadro P3000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 offers 179.2% better value.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro P3000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-63% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.6+179% | 10.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP104 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #529 | #380 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












