P106-100 vs Radeon 780M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Radeon 780M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P106-100 vs Radeon 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Radeon 780M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 780M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 4.2% in PassMark G3D (6,906 vs 6,628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 780M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 16nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P106-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 780M has the stronger long-term case.

P106-100 vs Radeon 780M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Radeon 780M

The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon 780M reaches 6,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
G3D Mark Score	6,628	6,906+4%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	16 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	1920+150%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS	8.909 TFLOPS+34%
Boost Clock	1733 MHz	2900 MHz+67%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120+150%	48
L1 Cache	720 KB+181%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and System on the Radeon 780M.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	Shared
Bus Width	128-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
DirectX	12_1	12.2+2%
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 4.0.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	VCN 4.0
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
TDP	75W	15W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	250mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	88.4	460.4+421%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 780M (2024 vs 2017).

Feature	P106-100	Radeon 780M
MSRP	$224	—
Codename	GP104	Phoenix
Release	December 12 2017	January 31 2024
Ranking	#529	#359

Search P106-100 on Amazon

Search Radeon 780M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.