P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

2019

Why buy it

✅P106-100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5% in PassMark G3D (6,959 vs 6,628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T2000 Max-Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

P106-100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 Max-Q has the stronger long-term case.

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 Max-Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Quadro T2000 Max-Q

The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the P106-100 scores 6,628 versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 Max-Q leads by 5%. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.318 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1620 MHz.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	6,628	6,959+5%
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1920+88%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+101%	3.318 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+7%	1620 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	120+88%	64
L1 Cache	0.7 MB	1 MB+43%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 Max-Q. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 Max-Q) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
DirectX	12_1	12.1
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro T2000 Max-Q's 40W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
TDP	75W	40W-47%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	250mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Perf/Watt	88.4	174.0+97%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T2000 Max-Q (2019 vs 2017).

Feature	P106-100	Quadro T2000 Max-Q
MSRP	$224	—
Codename	GP104	TU117
Release	December 12 2017	May 27 2019
Ranking	#529	#357

Search P106-100 on Amazon

Search Quadro T2000 Max-Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.