P106-100 vs Quadro P2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P106-100 is positioned at rank 43 and the Quadro P2000 is on rank 89, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar P106-100

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

93%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

93%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

93%

#28

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

499%

#43

P106-100

MSRP: $224|Avg: $30

100%

#48

Quadro K3100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400

96%

#50

Quadro K5000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509

95%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

94%

#52

Quadro K4100M

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261

94%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000

#49

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

93%

#50

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1750

92%

#51

RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $2015

90%

#52

RTX A1000

MSRP: $749|Avg: $500

88%

#54

Radeon Pro 5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $250

88%

#55

Quadro P4000

MSRP: $815|Avg: $290

86%

#74

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

901%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

100%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

99%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

95%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

94%

#99

Quadro K620

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

90%

#100

Tesla K20Xm

MSRP: $7699|Avg: N/A

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.1% higher G3D Mark score and 25% more VRAM (5 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-100.

Insight	P106-100	Quadro P2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+25%)
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	Standard Size (250mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P106-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $190), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 502.8% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	P106-100	Quadro P2000
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+502.8%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($30)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($190)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

P106-100 Benchmark Check

Quadro P2000 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and Quadro P2000

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Quadro P2000

The Quadro P2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1076 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,964 points. Launch price was $585.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the P106-100 scores 6,628 versus the Quadro P2000's 6,964 — the Quadro P2000 leads by 5.1%. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro P2000 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,024 (Quadro P2000). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.031 TFLOPS (Quadro P2000). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1480 MHz.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
G3D Mark Score	6,628	6,964+5%
Architecture	Pascal	Pascal
Process Node	16 nm	16 nm
Shading Units	1920+88%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.655 TFLOPS+120%	3.031 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1733 MHz+17%	1480 MHz
ROPs	64+60%	40
TMUs	120+88%	64
L1 Cache	720 KB+88%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P106-100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P2000 has 5 GB. The Quadro P2000 offers 25% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1.25 MB (Quadro P2000) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	5 GB+25%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+60%	1.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12.0 (Quadro P2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
DirectX	12_1	12.0
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P2000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP8.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	NVENC 6.0
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs	—	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro P2000's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro P2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro P2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 201mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

Feature	P106-100	Quadro P2000
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	250mm	201mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Perf/Watt	88.4	92.9+5%

💰

Value Analysis

The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro P2000 launched at $425 and now averages $190. The P106-100 costs 84.2% less ($160 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs 36.7 (Quadro P2000) — the P106-100 offers 501.9% better value.