
P106-100

Radeon Pro 5500M
P106-100 vs Radeon Pro 5500M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
P106-100 vs Radeon Pro 5500M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
P106-100 vs Radeon Pro 5500M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro 5500M
2019Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 vs Radeon Pro 5500M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Radeon Pro 5500M
The Radeon Pro 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,730 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon Pro 5500M reaches 6,730 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 4.454 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5500M). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1450 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628 | 6,730+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+49% | 4.454 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+20% | 1450 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+25% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5500M carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro 5500M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5500M.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5500M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5500M). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 2.0.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon Pro 5500M's 85W — a 12.5% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-12% | 85W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4+12% | 79.2 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5500M (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon Pro 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #529 | #363 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














