P106-100 vs Quadro T1000

P106-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

2019Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1455 MHz

P106-100 vs Quadro T1000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Quadro T1000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $176 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
  • Delivers 81.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 16.3 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
  • 60.3% longer card at 250mm vs 156mm.

Quadro T1000

2019

Why buy it

  • P106-100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T1000 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
  • Measures 156mm instead of 250mm, a 94mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 78.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $400 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.3 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($400 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P106-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (6,628 vs 6,505), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T1000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $176 cheaper on MSRP at $224 vs $400, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 81.9% (29.6 vs 16.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T1000 has the stronger long-term case.

P106-100 vs Quadro T1000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000

The Quadro T1000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1455 MHz. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,505 points.

Graphics Performance

The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Quadro T1000 reaches 6,505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T1000 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1455 MHz.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
G3D Mark Score
6,628+2%
6,505
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Boost Clock
1733 MHz+19%
1455 MHz

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 256-bit on the Quadro T1000.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro T1000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
DirectX
12_1
12 (12_1)
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs 5th Gen NVENC (Turing) (Quadro T1000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 4th Gen NVDEC.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
5th Gen NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
4th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,AV1 Decode
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro T1000's 50W — a 40% difference. The Quadro T1000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro T1000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
TDP
75W
50W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
250mm
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
88.4
130.1+47%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P106-100 came in at $224, while the Quadro T1000 launched at $400. On MSRP, P106-100 was 44% cheaper ($176 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.6 (P106-100) vs 16.3 (Quadro T1000) — the P106-100 offers 81.6% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T1000 (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureP106-100Quadro T1000
MSRP
$224-44%
$400
Performance per Dollar
29.6+82%
16.3
Codename
GP104
TU117
Release
December 12 2017
May 27 2019
Ranking
#529
#376

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.