
P106-100

Radeon RX Vega M GH
P106-100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
P106-100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
P106-100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
P106-100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Radeon RX Vega M GH is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P106-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 100W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌24900% longer card at 250mm vs 1mm.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
2018Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 250mm, a 249mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 29.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $224 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628+1% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+82% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+46% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120+25% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+88% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH carries 0 MB. P106-100 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GH. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 250mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 250mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4+35% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the P106-100 came in at $224, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GH was 100+% cheaper ($224 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.6 (P106-100) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GH (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 29.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #529 | #373 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














