CPU
GPU
P106-100
Popular choices:
Radeon RX Vega M GH
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The P106-100 is positioned at rank #43 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX Vega M GH uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX Vega M GH likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The P106-100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GH.
| Insight | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the P106-100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Radeon RX Vega M GH
The Radeon RX Vega M GH is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1063 MHz to 1190 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,548 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the Radeon RX Vega M GH reaches 6,548 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX Vega M GH uses GCN 4.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,536 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1190 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628+1% | 6,548 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+25% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+82% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+46% | 1190 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120+25% | 96 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+88% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH has 0 MB. The P106-100 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 1024-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 1024-bit+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12_1 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 6.3.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 6.3 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GH's 100W — a 28.6% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GH). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 250mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-25% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 250mm | 1mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4+35% | 65.5 |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon RX Vega M GH launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon RX Vega M GH costs 100+% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs Infinity (Radeon RX Vega M GH) — the Radeon RX Vega M GH offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon RX Vega M GH is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-100 | Radeon RX Vega M GH |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 220.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP104 | Polaris 22 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #529 | #373 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-100 and Radeon RX Vega M GH
