P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel)

P106-100

2017Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz
Similar parts
·
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019Core: 1575 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz
Similar parts
···

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel) Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P106-100

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $276 less on MSRP ($224 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 112.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.6 vs 13.9 G3D/$ ($224 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 25% higher power demand at 75W vs 60W.

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

2019

Why buy it

  • P106-100 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 60W instead of 75W, a 15W reduction.
  • More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 123.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $500 MSRPvs$224 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.9 vs 29.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $224 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5% in PassMark G3D (6,959 vs 6,628), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 16nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
P106-100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $276 cheaper on MSRP at $224 vs $500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 112.6% (29.6 vs 13.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, P106-100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T2000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel) Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

P106-100

The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T2000 (móvel)

The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the P106-100 scores 6,628 versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) leads by 5%. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
G3D Mark Score
6,628
6,959+5%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
16 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1920+88%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.655 TFLOPS+82%
3.656 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1785 MHz+3%
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
120+88%
64
L1 Cache
0.7 MB
1 MB+43%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the P106-100 and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000 (móvel). L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
256-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
DirectX
12_1
12.1
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Encoder
NVENC 6th Gen
NVENC 7.0
Decoder
NVDEC 3rd Gen
PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
TDP
75W
60W-20%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
250mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Perf/Watt
88.4
116.0+31%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P106-100 came in at $224, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500. On MSRP, P106-100 was 55.2% cheaper ($276 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 29.6 (P106-100) vs 13.9 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 offers 112.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro T2000 (móvel) (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureP106-100Quadro T2000 (móvel)
MSRP
$224-55%
$500
Performance per Dollar
29.6+113%
13.9
Codename
GP104
TU117
Release
December 12 2017
May 27 2019
Ranking
#529
#319

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.