P106-100 vs Quadro T2000 (móvel)
P106-100
Popular choices:
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P106-100 is positioned at rank 43 and the Quadro T2000 (móvel) is on rank 105, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000 (móvel)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The P106-100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-100.
| Insight | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $150 for the Quadro T2000 (móvel), it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 376.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+376.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.
Quadro T2000 (móvel)
The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1575 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,959 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the P106-100 scores 6,628 versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 6,959 — the Quadro T2000 (móvel) leads by 5%. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 1,024 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 3.656 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1785 MHz.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628 | 6,959+5% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+88% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+82% | 3.656 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | 1785 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 120+88% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 1 MB+43% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12.1 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the Quadro T2000 (móvel)'s 60W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (Quadro T2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 60W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4 | 116.0+31% |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Quadro T2000 (móvel) launched at $500 and now averages $150. The P106-100 costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs 46.4 (Quadro T2000 (móvel)) — the P106-100 offers 376.1% better value. The Quadro T2000 (móvel) is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | P106-100 | Quadro T2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-55% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-80% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 220.9+376% | 46.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | TU117 |
| Release | December 12 2017 | May 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #529 | #319 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on P106-100 and Quadro T2000 (móvel)
