
P106-100 vs FirePro W8100

P106-100
Popular choices:

FirePro W8100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The P106-100 is positioned at rank 43 and the FirePro W8100 is on rank 254, so the P106-100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar P106-100
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W8100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro W8100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P106-100.
| Insight | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (250mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The P106-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P106-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $200), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 548.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+548.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of P106-100 and FirePro W8100

P106-100
The P106-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,628 points.

FirePro W8100
The FirePro W8100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 23 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 824 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,812 points.
Graphics Performance
The P106-100 scores 6,628 and the FirePro W8100 reaches 6,812 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P106-100 is built on Pascal while the FirePro W8100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (P106-100) vs 2,560 (FirePro W8100). Raw compute: 6.655 TFLOPS (P106-100) vs 4.219 TFLOPS (FirePro W8100).
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 6,628 | 6,812+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.655 TFLOPS+58% | 4.219 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+13% | 640 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The P106-100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W8100 has 8 GB. The FirePro W8100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (P106-100) vs 1 MB (FirePro W8100) — the P106-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (P106-100) vs 12 (FirePro W8100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (P106-100) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W8100). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2,MVC |
Power & Dimensions
The P106-100 draws 75W versus the FirePro W8100's 220W — a 98.3% difference. The P106-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P106-100) vs 350W (FirePro W8100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-66% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 87°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.4+185% | 31.0 |
Value Analysis
The P106-100 launched at $224 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the FirePro W8100 launched at $2499 and now averages $200. The P106-100 costs 85% less ($170 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 220.9 (P106-100) vs 34.1 (FirePro W8100) — the P106-100 offers 547.8% better value. The P106-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | P106-100 | FirePro W8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $224-91% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-85% | $200 |
| Performance per Dollar | 220.9+548% | 34.1 |
| Codename | GP104 | Hawaii |
| Release | December 12 2017 | June 23 2014 |
| Ranking | #529 | #361 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















