G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Quadro T2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Quadro T2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

2017

Why buy it

✅293.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
36.5% HIGHER MSRP
$819 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($819 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
❌61.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 62W.

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $219 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
✅Delivers 32.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.1 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $819 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 100W, a 38W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P4000 (móvel) across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 293.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3% in PassMark G3D (7,500 vs 7,279), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro P4000 (móvel) is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro T2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $219 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $819, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 32.5% (12.1 vs 9.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro T2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P4000 (móvel) has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P4000 (móvel) vs Quadro T2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P4000 (móvel)

The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1227 MHz to 1228 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,500 points. Launch price was $819.61.

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P4000 (móvel) scores 7,500 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4000 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 16 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 4.398 TFLOPS (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
G3D Mark Score	7,500+3%	7,279
Architecture	Pascal	Fermi
Process Node	16 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1792+833%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.398 TFLOPS+816%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	112+250%	32
L1 Cache	672 KB+163%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro P4000 (móvel) and 256-bit on the Quadro T2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro P4000 (móvel) has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit	256-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (6th Gen) (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: NVDEC (3rd Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
Encoder	NVENC (6th Gen)	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC (3rd Gen)	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P4000 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
TDP	100W	62W-38%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	0mm
Height	0mm	0mm
Slots	0	0
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	75.0	117.4+57%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P4000 (móvel) came in at $819, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600. On MSRP, Quadro T2000 was 26.7% cheaper ($219 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Quadro P4000 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro T2000 offers 31.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P4000 (móvel) (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro P4000 (móvel)	Quadro T2000
MSRP	$819	$600-27%
Performance per Dollar	9.2	12.1+32%
Codename	GP104	GF106
Release	January 11 2017	December 24 2010
Ranking	#326	#902

Search Quadro P4000 (móvel) on Amazon

Search Quadro T2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.